Logo   | Search
About
Project Feasibility Study
Hardware Design &
Fabrication
Program Development & Debugging
Product Characterization & Correlation


 
   
 
 
Enter
 
 
Bad For Google, Good For India
Swaminathan S Anklesaria Aiyar
NEW DELHI

EVER since Barack Obama replaced George Bush, US foreign policy has been drifting away from India and towards China and Pakistan. That drift could be reversed if Google pulls out of China because of Chinese government hacking into its sites to target human rights activists.

Cynics say that the US foreign policy and business pay only lipservice to human rights or democracy. It is true that if Google exits China, US-China relations will not be wrecked, and US corporates will not switch all their investment from China to India. But, make no mistake, it will hit a nerve in a Democratic administration sensitive to its human rights constituency. And, foreign investors in China will start worrying that their own commercial secrets and intellectual property could be at risk because of officially-blessed hacking.

Former president Bush used his limited political capital to push through the historic nuclear deal with India. Although India is far behind China in economic and military terms today, Bush pushed for a special relationship with India as a long-term Democratic partner that could counter China in Asia.

Since Obama took over, the mood in Washington has changed palpably. During his recent visit to China, Obama praised Beijing and downplayed old criticisms of China’s human rights violations currency manipulation. This fuelled US media speculation about a new G-2 comprising just the US and China, and reversed the Bush attempt to promote India at China’s expense.

Notwithstanding the nuclear deal, Obama has severely restricted US export licensing for dual-use technology to India.

BREATHING FIRE

2000

Chinese-language version of Google launched

2005

Google China founded to take on Baidu.com

Jan ‘06

Google.cn launched
It gave notifications to Chinese users whenever search results have been removed. Google said it will not maintain any services, like email, that involve confidential data in China.

Oct ‘06

Chinese writers accuse Google of copyright infringement. People's Daily criticised Google of censoring its website on the copyright dispute.

2008 -

YouTube, part of Google, blocked for carrying a video of the Tibetan riots
Jan ‘10 Citing targeted attack from China in December, to gain access to email accounts of Chinese human rights activists, Google threatens to withdraw from China

Obama backs Pak stand on India’s role in Afghanistan

He does not wish to sell India equipment for nuclear enrichment or reprocessing. An agreement on spent fuel was expected to be signed when Manmohan Singh visited Washington, but could not be finalised.

Obama and Hilary Clinton have bought Pakistan’s argument that Indian activities in Afghanistan should be minimised to assuage Pakistani concerns in Baluchistan. Unlike Bush, Obama and Clinton agreed with Pakistan that Kashmir was part of the Taliban-al Qaeda issue, and sought to appoint Richard Holbrooke as special envoy to India as well as Pakistan and Afghanistan, a move India eventually stymied.

However, these changes are less fundamental than an immediate reaction to two crises: the economic crisis at home and the worsening situation in Afghanistan. Much of the US shift towards China is attributable to US economic weakness during the Great Recession that appears to have ended recently. China has for years been buying US gilts, and holds over a trillion dollars of US securities in its forex reserves. If China dumps these on the market, the dollar will crash. However, in 2009, the main buyers of US gilts have been the Fed and other US banks getting Fed finance, with China’s fresh purchases being minimal. A crashing dollar will mean a crash in the value of China’s forex reserves, so it cannot credibly threaten to dump its US gilts. With the end of the recession, Obama can shift from the defensive to the offensive on China, and change the emphasis from economic cooperation to human rights. Such a shift will require a topical peg. Google’s exit from China could provide just that.

US corporations are not bleeding-heart liberals that spend sleepless nights worrying about human rights. They can be utterly cynical. On hearing that Google might exit China, the Nasdaq saw the share price of Baidu, Google’s main competitor in China, shoot up 6.8%, while the price of Google dropped 1.1%. However, once the recession ends, these corporates will once again be harried by politicians and civil society to display corporate social responsibility, and at the margin this will diminish their enthusiasm to invest in China, especially for export. Besides, everybody knows that the old global imbalances — created when China used an undervalued currency to create huge export surpluses —were a cause of the Great recession, and must be avoided in the coming years. US corporations know that they must diversify out of China to other investment destinations, and India is an obvious alternative. No radical changes will occur overnight. But, if indeed, it is established that China has been hacking into Google to target human rights activists, US foreign policy and business will tilt away from China to India. What’s bad for Google may be good for India.

Source : The Economic Times.com

 
Copyright © ChipTest, All Rights Reserved | Disclaimer
Designed & Developed by Cherry
Home